PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 34,293).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +253.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 8324PN needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +253.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 8324PN needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 34,293).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 8324PN?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 253.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better fit. You are getting 309.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is at an unclear MSRP at $449 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 253.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 32/64 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8324PN Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	159 FPS	266 FPS
medium	131 FPS	247 FPS
high	110 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	258 FPS
medium	114 FPS	215 FPS
high	90 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	179 FPS
medium	58 FPS	149 FPS
high	45 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	209 FPS	857 FPS
medium	209 FPS	737 FPS
high	174 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	722 FPS
medium	176 FPS	611 FPS
high	150 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	396 FPS
medium	111 FPS	339 FPS
high	97 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	273 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	209 FPS	857 FPS
medium	209 FPS	857 FPS
high	209 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	857 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	857 FPS
medium	209 FPS	851 FPS
high	209 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	558 FPS
medium	209 FPS	479 FPS
high	209 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	362 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	209 FPS	857 FPS
medium	209 FPS	857 FPS
high	209 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	782 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	857 FPS
medium	209 FPS	760 FPS
high	209 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	618 FPS
medium	209 FPS	556 FPS
high	209 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	428 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.05 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 121.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5 GHz+67%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	4.4 GHz+115%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+33%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	8,375	34,293+309%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	SP6	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8324PN) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 8324PN requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.