EPYC 8324PN vs Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD

EPYC 8324PN

32 Cores64 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

  • +300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
  • Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 26,609).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +115.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 8324PN?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 115.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 217.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 115.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324PN is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
1080p
low159 FPS156 FPS
medium131 FPS129 FPS
high110 FPS115 FPS
ultra87 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS137 FPS
medium114 FPS111 FPS
high90 FPS95 FPS
ultra72 FPS78 FPS
4K
low68 FPS77 FPS
medium58 FPS67 FPS
high45 FPS55 FPS
ultra37 FPS43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
1080p
low209 FPS649 FPS
medium209 FPS549 FPS
high174 FPS448 FPS
ultra138 FPS404 FPS
1440p
low194 FPS552 FPS
medium176 FPS484 FPS
high150 FPS407 FPS
ultra116 FPS350 FPS
4K
low120 FPS343 FPS
medium111 FPS303 FPS
high97 FPS277 FPS
ultra79 FPS245 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
1080p
low209 FPS665 FPS
medium209 FPS557 FPS
high209 FPS509 FPS
ultra209 FPS439 FPS
1440p
low209 FPS554 FPS
medium209 FPS458 FPS
high209 FPS419 FPS
ultra209 FPS358 FPS
4K
low209 FPS402 FPS
medium209 FPS322 FPS
high209 FPS292 FPS
ultra209 FPS229 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
1080p
low209 FPS665 FPS
medium209 FPS665 FPS
high209 FPS665 FPS
ultra209 FPS665 FPS
1440p
low209 FPS665 FPS
medium209 FPS665 FPS
high209 FPS607 FPS
ultra209 FPS533 FPS
4K
low209 FPS545 FPS
medium209 FPS488 FPS
high209 FPS439 FPS
ultra209 FPS385 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 104.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

FeatureEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2.05 GHz
3.4 GHz+66%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+300%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
8,375
26,609+218%
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,715
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
Socket
SP6
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8324PN) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

FeatureEPYC 8324PNRyzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming