
EPYC 8324PN
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 26,609).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +115.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +115.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 26,609).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 8324PN?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 8324PN
EPYC 8324PN
The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 104.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | 3.4 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,375 | 26,609+218% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8324PN) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












