EPYC 8324PN
Popular choices:
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 22,430).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +172.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +172.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 22,430).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 8324PN?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 242 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 275 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 8324PN
EPYC 8324PN
The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.
Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 91.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | 3.6 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,375 | 22,430+168% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 7 3700X
