PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 21,550).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +88.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 8324PN.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +88.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 8324PN.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 21,550).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than EPYC 8324PN?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 88.2% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better fit. You are getting 157.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 88.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8324PN Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 5 5600
1080p
low	159 FPS	161 FPS
medium	131 FPS	130 FPS
high	110 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	141 FPS
medium	114 FPS	113 FPS
high	90 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	79 FPS
medium	58 FPS	69 FPS
high	45 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 5 5600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 5 5600
1080p
low	209 FPS	508 FPS
medium	209 FPS	419 FPS
high	174 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	310 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	447 FPS
medium	176 FPS	375 FPS
high	150 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	277 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	313 FPS
medium	111 FPS	268 FPS
high	97 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	209 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 5 5600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 5 5600
1080p
low	209 FPS	539 FPS
medium	209 FPS	526 FPS
high	209 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	414 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	539 FPS
medium	209 FPS	434 FPS
high	209 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	371 FPS
medium	209 FPS	298 FPS
high	209 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	197 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 5 5600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 5 5600
1080p
low	209 FPS	539 FPS
medium	209 FPS	539 FPS
high	209 FPS	539 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	539 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	539 FPS
medium	209 FPS	539 FPS
high	209 FPS	539 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	501 FPS
medium	209 FPS	448 FPS
high	209 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	349 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Ryzen 5 5600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 5 5600

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 88.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Ryzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+433%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.4 GHz+47%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	3.5 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+300%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark	8,375	21,550+157%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,077
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.