
EPYC 7281
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8891 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7281
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8891 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
Xeon E7-8891 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,615 vs 21,621).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $6,841 MSRP, while EPYC 7281 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7281
2017Xeon E7-8891 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8891 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,615 vs 21,621).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $6,841 MSRP, while EPYC 7281 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7281 better than Xeon E7-8891 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7281 and Xeon E7-8891 v3

EPYC 7281
EPYC 7281
The EPYC 7281 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon E7-8891 v3
Xeon E7-8891 v3
The Xeon E7-8891 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,615 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7281 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7281 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7281 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E7-8891 v3 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8891 v3 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7281 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7281 scores 21,621 against the Xeon E7-8891 v3's 21,615 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7281. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7281 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8891 v3.
| Feature | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+60% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB (total)+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| PassMark | 21,621 | 21,615 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7281 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7281) / Yes (Xeon E7-8891 v3).
| Feature | EPYC 7281 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













