
Core i9-14900KS
Popular choices:

EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900KS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $768 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.8 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 60,531).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 80.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Core i9-14900KS
2024EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $768 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.8 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 60,531).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 80.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Core i9-14900KS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 792 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 794 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 1166 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 1102 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 879 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 806 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 394 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1091 FPS | 1303 FPS |
| medium | 975 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 853 FPS | 993 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 865 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 1035 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 897 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 772 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 577 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900KS and EPYC 4584PX

Core i9-14900KS
Core i9-14900KS
The Core i9-14900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Marchar 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.9 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,531 points. Launch price was $689.

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 4584PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900KS has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.9 GHz on the Core i9-14900KS versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-14900KS uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4584PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900KS scores 60,531 against the EPYC 4584PX's 60,169 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-14900KS. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.9 GHz+4% | 5.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 60,531 | 60,169 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4584PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900KS versus 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX — the Core i9-14900KS supports 7.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4584PX supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900KS) vs 28 (EPYC 4584PX) — the EPYC 4584PX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,Z690 (Core i9-14900KS) and AM5 (EPYC 4584PX).
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+8% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 256+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900KS) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900KS) and AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4584PX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900KS launched at $749 MSRP, while the EPYC 4584PX debuted at $1517. On MSRP ($749 vs $1517), the Core i9-14900KS is $768 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900KS delivers 80.8 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 4584PX — making the Core i9-14900KS the 68.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-51% | $1517 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.8+104% | 39.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













