
Core Ultra 7 266V
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2682 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,971 vs 19,274).
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,971 vs 19,274).
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Xeon E5-2682 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 355 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 266V and Xeon E5-2682 v4

Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V
The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V. The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+100% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 40 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 4 MB+60% |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,274+2% | 18,971 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FCLGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













