PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 255HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (49,765 vs 50,189).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $5,945 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 255HX

2025

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (49,765 vs 50,189).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $5,945 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255HX better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 255HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 255HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 7 255HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $5,945 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 255HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 7 255HX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	280 FPS	187 FPS
medium	272 FPS	163 FPS
high	228 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	154 FPS
medium	193 FPS	129 FPS
high	156 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	70 FPS
medium	129 FPS	62 FPS
high	99 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255HX Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	673 FPS	542 FPS
medium	574 FPS	485 FPS
high	483 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	438 FPS	360 FPS
1440p
low	584 FPS	473 FPS
medium	515 FPS	423 FPS
high	434 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	303 FPS
4K
low	345 FPS	295 FPS
medium	310 FPS	266 FPS
high	292 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	218 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255HX Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	839 FPS	920 FPS
medium	685 FPS	832 FPS
high	610 FPS	771 FPS
ultra	522 FPS	679 FPS
1440p
low	727 FPS	791 FPS
medium	596 FPS	712 FPS
high	519 FPS	655 FPS
ultra	441 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	515 FPS	524 FPS
medium	434 FPS	440 FPS
high	394 FPS	393 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	327 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255HX Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	995 FPS	948 FPS
medium	901 FPS	853 FPS
high	782 FPS	739 FPS
ultra	709 FPS	642 FPS
1440p
low	814 FPS	779 FPS
medium	724 FPS	682 FPS
high	627 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	505 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	569 FPS
medium	501 FPS	510 FPS
high	449 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255HX Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255HX and Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Core Ultra 7 255HX

The Core Ultra 7 255HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,765 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 49,765 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 255HX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads	20 / 20	32 / 64+60%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+27%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	60 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+50%	2 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	49,765	50,189
Geekbench 6 Single	2,923	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,885	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870,Intel WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket	FCBGA2114	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	5600+111900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	80+233%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 255HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). The Core Ultra 7 255HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 255HX rivals Ryzen 9 9850HX; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.