
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+45.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+45.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 7 165H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 37.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 22+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+46% | 25,849 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 165H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













