
Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 613 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 956 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 758 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245 and Ryzen 7 3700X

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 56.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+16% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 40,165+79% | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+159900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 128 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245 launched at $319 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($319 vs $329), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 59.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $319-3% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+85% | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












