
Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 245HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $319 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Core Ultra 5 245HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,605 vs 40,165).
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Core Ultra 5 245HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $319 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,605 vs 40,165).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Core Ultra 5 245HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 839 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 685 FPS |
| high | 613 FPS | 610 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 596 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 323 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 990 FPS |
| medium | 956 FPS | 906 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 758 FPS | 714 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 820 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245 and Core Ultra 5 245HX

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.

Core Ultra 5 245HX
Core Ultra 5 245HX
The Core Ultra 5 245HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,605 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Core Ultra 5 245 and Core Ultra 5 245HX share an identical 14-core/14-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Core Ultra 5 245HX's 39,605 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| PassMark | 40,165+1% | 39,605 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. Both support up to 256 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) — the Core Ultra 5 245HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 5 245HX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 245HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Core Ultra 5 245HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Core Ultra 5 245HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













