Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 8945H

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 235H

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 150% higher power demand at 20W vs 8W.

Ryzen 9 8945H

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 8W instead of 20W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 17,607).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Ryzen 9 8945H?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 235H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 235H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 235H is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 235H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 5 235H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
1080p
low299 FPS269 FPS
medium262 FPS243 FPS
high218 FPS204 FPS
ultra187 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low245 FPS236 FPS
medium193 FPS193 FPS
high157 FPS157 FPS
ultra138 FPS139 FPS
4K
low168 FPS164 FPS
medium134 FPS136 FPS
high104 FPS105 FPS
ultra90 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
1080p
low746 FPS513 FPS
medium625 FPS421 FPS
high499 FPS363 FPS
ultra440 FPS323 FPS
1440p
low704 FPS448 FPS
medium566 FPS388 FPS
high453 FPS334 FPS
ultra379 FPS285 FPS
4K
low415 FPS295 FPS
medium339 FPS267 FPS
high311 FPS253 FPS
ultra268 FPS217 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
1080p
low746 FPS756 FPS
medium746 FPS756 FPS
high746 FPS647 FPS
ultra653 FPS546 FPS
1440p
low746 FPS756 FPS
medium721 FPS637 FPS
high624 FPS541 FPS
ultra537 FPS464 FPS
4K
low628 FPS541 FPS
medium519 FPS473 FPS
high458 FPS419 FPS
ultra383 FPS355 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
1080p
low746 FPS756 FPS
medium746 FPS756 FPS
high746 FPS756 FPS
ultra741 FPS754 FPS
1440p
low746 FPS756 FPS
medium746 FPS756 FPS
high677 FPS660 FPS
ultra579 FPS573 FPS
4K
low604 FPS572 FPS
medium538 FPS511 FPS
high486 FPS457 FPS
ultra423 FPS394 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235H and Ryzen 9 8945H

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,240 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 235H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8945H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945H — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 29,820 against the Ryzen 9 8945H's 30,240 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,607 vs 17,500 (0.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,693 vs 2,617, a 2.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,040 vs 12,662 (10.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 8945H.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
Cores / Threads
14 / 14+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.2 GHz+4%
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+10%
4 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB+13%
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
29,820
30,240+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,607
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,693+3%
2,617
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,040+11%
12,662
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 8945H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 8945H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 8945H).

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
256 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 8945H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945H). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 8945H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop, Ryzen 9 8945H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 9 8945H rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 8945H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop
Gaming