
Core Ultra 5 235H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 8945H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌150% higher power demand at 20W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 8945H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 20W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 17,607).
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Ryzen 9 8945H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 20W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌150% higher power demand at 20W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 17,607).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Ryzen 9 8945H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 453 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| high | 746 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| high | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| ultra | 741 FPS | 754 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 756 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235H and Ryzen 9 8945H

Core Ultra 5 235H
Core Ultra 5 235H
The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.


Ryzen 9 8945H
Ryzen 9 8945H
The Ryzen 9 8945H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,240 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8945H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945H — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 29,820 against the Ryzen 9 8945H's 30,240 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,607 vs 17,500 (0.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,693 vs 2,617, a 2.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,040 vs 12,662 (10.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 8945H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 8 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,820 | 30,240+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,607 | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,693+3% | 2,617 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,040+11% | 12,662 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 8945H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 8945H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 8945H).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 8945H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945H). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 8945H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop, Ryzen 9 8945H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 9 8945H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | Ryzen 9 8945H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












