
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 135H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 135H.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 226 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 413 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core Ultra 5 135H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135H offers 14 cores / 18 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 5 135H's 22,116 — a 12.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 18+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 22,116+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 5 135H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












