Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 5 135H

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 135H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,116).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core Ultra 5 135H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 135H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 9.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 13.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 135H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135H is the better fit. You are getting 13.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 18 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 135H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 135H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 135H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 18 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low183 FPS193 FPS
medium168 FPS154 FPS
high139 FPS126 FPS
ultra119 FPS102 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS156 FPS
medium132 FPS122 FPS
high106 FPS98 FPS
ultra89 FPS81 FPS
4K
low87 FPS86 FPS
medium81 FPS73 FPS
high64 FPS59 FPS
ultra49 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low471 FPS553 FPS
medium397 FPS521 FPS
high341 FPS422 FPS
ultra301 FPS378 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS549 FPS
medium351 FPS457 FPS
high309 FPS379 FPS
ultra265 FPS324 FPS
4K
low282 FPS337 FPS
medium248 FPS283 FPS
high229 FPS258 FPS
ultra196 FPS226 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low488 FPS553 FPS
medium488 FPS553 FPS
high488 FPS553 FPS
ultra488 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS553 FPS
medium488 FPS553 FPS
high485 FPS553 FPS
ultra434 FPS494 FPS
4K
low442 FPS548 FPS
medium389 FPS441 FPS
high337 FPS400 FPS
ultra274 FPS321 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
1080p
low488 FPS553 FPS
medium488 FPS553 FPS
high488 FPS553 FPS
ultra488 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS553 FPS
medium488 FPS553 FPS
high488 FPS553 FPS
ultra473 FPS553 FPS
4K
low488 FPS553 FPS
medium450 FPS524 FPS
high391 FPS473 FPS
ultra330 FPS413 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core Ultra 5 135H

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135H offers 14 cores / 18 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 5 135H's 22,116 — a 12.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
14 / 18+133%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
19,532
22,116+13%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 5 135H
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value