
Core i7-12800HX
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12800HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+9.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,050 vs 18,680).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $231 MSRP, while Core i7-12800HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12800HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12800HX
2022Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅+9.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,050 vs 18,680).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $231 MSRP, while Core i7-12800HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12800HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225F better than Core i7-12800HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 789 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 777 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 742 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 402 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12800HX and Core Ultra 5 225F

Core i7-12800HX
Core i7-12800HX
The Core i7-12800HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,229 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F
The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12800HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i7-12800HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12800HX versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-12800HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12800HX scores 31,229 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,680 vs 17,050 (9.1% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,653, a 29.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 13,028 (14.1% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12800HX vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.
| Feature | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+60% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+25% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,229 | 31,541 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,680+10% | 17,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,653+35% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+15% | 13,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12800HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12800HX) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM670,WM690 (Core i7-12800HX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).
| Feature | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12800HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-12800HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F). The Core i7-12800HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12800HX targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12800HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800HX.
| Feature | Core i7-12800HX | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













