
Core i5-1230U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1230U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,995 vs 11,059).
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1230U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 15W vs 9.5W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1230U moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1230U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1230U
2022Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,995 vs 11,059).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1230U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 15W vs 9.5W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1230U moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1230U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1230U better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 190 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 276 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1230U and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

Core i5-1230U
Core i5-1230U
The Core i5-1230U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9.5 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,995 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,059 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1230U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-1230U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1230U versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1230U (base: 1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-1230U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1230U scores 10,995 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U's 11,059 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1230U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.
| Feature | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.7 GHz+170% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) |
| PassMark | 10,995 | 11,059 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,625 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1230U uses the FCBGA1781 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1781 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1230U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U). The Core i5-1230U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1230U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1230U rivals Ryzen 5 5600U.
| Feature | Core i5-1230U | Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













