
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.1% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$340 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120
2025Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌32.1% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$340 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 24.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 27,712+28% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($340 vs $449), the Core 5 120 is $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Core 5 120 the 3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340-24% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+3% | 61.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












