Core 5 120 vs Core i5-13600K

Intel

Core 5 120

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13600K
VS
Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 37,655).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
  • Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core 5 120?
Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 28.6% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data and 74.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 28.6% more average FPS across 14 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 74.1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $340 MSRP, and it gives you a 28.6% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.9% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 63.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
1080p
low170 FPS281 FPS
medium147 FPS264 FPS
high118 FPS220 FPS
ultra99 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS235 FPS
medium123 FPS198 FPS
high99 FPS158 FPS
ultra83 FPS138 FPS
4K
low79 FPS159 FPS
medium72 FPS133 FPS
high57 FPS102 FPS
ultra44 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
1080p
low471 FPS632 FPS
medium401 FPS533 FPS
high338 FPS450 FPS
ultra298 FPS416 FPS
1440p
low409 FPS540 FPS
medium355 FPS474 FPS
high309 FPS403 FPS
ultra264 FPS351 FPS
4K
low274 FPS316 FPS
medium243 FPS282 FPS
high223 FPS269 FPS
ultra191 FPS238 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
1080p
low541 FPS663 FPS
medium541 FPS543 FPS
high541 FPS477 FPS
ultra496 FPS414 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS600 FPS
medium491 FPS499 FPS
high445 FPS434 FPS
ultra388 FPS376 FPS
4K
low411 FPS441 FPS
medium347 FPS381 FPS
high303 FPS344 FPS
ultra244 FPS295 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
1080p
low541 FPS941 FPS
medium541 FPS941 FPS
high541 FPS923 FPS
ultra541 FPS831 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS941 FPS
medium541 FPS850 FPS
high541 FPS738 FPS
ultra534 FPS651 FPS
4K
low541 FPS651 FPS
medium499 FPS588 FPS
high440 FPS529 FPS
ultra376 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Core i5-13600K

Intel

Core 5 120

The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Processing Power

The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 54.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
14 / 20+133%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
5.1 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
24 MB+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark
21,629
37,655+74%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. On MSRP ($340 vs $329), the Core i5-13600K is $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 57.1% better value option.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-13600K
MSRP
$340
$329-3%
Performance per Dollar
63.6
114.5+80%
Release Date
2025
2022