
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core 5 120
2025Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 941 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Core i5-13600K

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 54.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 37,655+74% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. On MSRP ($340 vs $329), the Core i5-13600K is $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 57.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340 | $329-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | 114.5+80% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













