
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 5 120
2025Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Core i5-13400F

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 14.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 25,029+16% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($340 vs $196), the Core i5-13400F is $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 67% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340 | $196-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | 127.7+101% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













