Core 5 120 vs Core i5-12400F

Intel

Core 5 120

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-12400F
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120

2025

Why buy it

  • +10.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $166 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
  • Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,629).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 120 better than Core i5-12400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120 pulls ahead with 10.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120 is the better fit. You are getting 10.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 5 120 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 5 120 is 95.4% more expensive on MSRP at $340 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you 10.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-12400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 76.5% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 63.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
1080p
low170 FPS183 FPS
medium147 FPS168 FPS
high118 FPS139 FPS
ultra99 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS153 FPS
medium123 FPS132 FPS
high99 FPS106 FPS
ultra83 FPS89 FPS
4K
low79 FPS87 FPS
medium72 FPS81 FPS
high57 FPS64 FPS
ultra44 FPS49 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
1080p
low471 FPS471 FPS
medium401 FPS397 FPS
high338 FPS341 FPS
ultra298 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low409 FPS407 FPS
medium355 FPS351 FPS
high309 FPS309 FPS
ultra264 FPS265 FPS
4K
low274 FPS282 FPS
medium243 FPS248 FPS
high223 FPS229 FPS
ultra191 FPS196 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
1080p
low541 FPS488 FPS
medium541 FPS488 FPS
high541 FPS488 FPS
ultra496 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS488 FPS
medium491 FPS488 FPS
high445 FPS485 FPS
ultra388 FPS434 FPS
4K
low411 FPS442 FPS
medium347 FPS389 FPS
high303 FPS337 FPS
ultra244 FPS274 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
1080p
low541 FPS488 FPS
medium541 FPS488 FPS
high541 FPS488 FPS
ultra541 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS488 FPS
medium541 FPS488 FPS
high541 FPS488 FPS
ultra534 FPS473 FPS
4K
low541 FPS488 FPS
medium499 FPS450 FPS
high440 FPS391 FPS
ultra376 FPS330 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Core i5-12400F

Intel

Core 5 120

The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

Both the Core 5 120 and Core i5-12400F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 10.2% lead for the Core 5 120. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+2%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
21,629+11%
19,532
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. On MSRP ($340 vs $174), the Core i5-12400F is $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 55.3% better value option.

FeatureCore 5 120Core i5-12400F
MSRP
$340
$174-49%
Performance per Dollar
63.6
112.3+77%
Release Date
2025
2022