
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅+10.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,629).
Core 5 120
2025Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+10.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 120.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,629).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 196 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Core i5-12400F

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
Both the Core 5 120 and Core i5-12400F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 10.2% lead for the Core 5 120. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+2% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 21,629+11% | 19,532 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120 launched at $340 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. On MSRP ($340 vs $174), the Core i5-12400F is $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 55.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340 | $174-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | 112.3+77% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













