Quadro FX 4600 vs FirePro S7000

Quadro FX 4600

FirePro S7000

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 4600

150

403

0.0%

4,524

+1022.6%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

403

G3D Mark Score

4524

Performance Difference

FirePro S7000 is 1022.6% faster than Quadro FX 4600

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 4600768 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM · 403 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

FirePro S70004096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

13%

low60%

medium20%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low30%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 4,524 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro S7000 performs 1022.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 4600 and FirePro S7000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 4600 and FirePro S7000

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24

TMUs:64

Vram:768 MB

L2 Cache:192 kB

Core Clock:602 MHz

Shading Units:192

Transistor Count:1,400 million

Texture Fill Rate:38.53

Manufacturing Process:55 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt

Floating Point Performance:0.4623 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B

Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)

Launch Price:$1,799

Release Date:November 11 2008

Performance Ranking Position:884

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.