RADEON HD6410D vs FirePro W9000

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS

FirePro W9000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

423

G3D Mark Score

6157

Performance Difference

FirePro W9000 is 1355.6% faster than RADEON HD6410D

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

RADEON HD6410DN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
FirePro W90006144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
30%
low82%
medium60%
high20%
ultra10%
1440pLow
15%
low60%
medium20%
high10%
ultra4%
4KLimited
7%
low20%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 6,157 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro W9000 performs 1355.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between RADEON HD6410D and FirePro W9000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for RADEON HD6410D and FirePro W9000

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It includes 2 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:4
TMUs:8
Vram:null
L0 Cache:32 kB
L1 Cache:32 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:400 MHz
Boost Clock:2200 MHz
Shading Units:128
Ray Tracing Cores:2
Texture Fill Rate:17.60
Manufacturing Process:5 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):15 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.5632 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Dragon Range
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Release Date:January 3 2023
Performance Ranking Position:843

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:975 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:124.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.994 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$3,999
Release Date:June 14 2012
Performance Ranking Position:390

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON HD6410D and FirePro W9000