
A12-9800
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A12-9800
2017Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 22,430).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +264.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while A12-9800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.
A12-9800
2017Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +264.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 22,430).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while A12-9800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A12-9800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A12-9800 and Ryzen 7 3700X

A12-9800
A12-9800
The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 143.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,695 | 22,430+507% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 635 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












