
A12-9800
Popular choices:

Pentium Gold G6505T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A12-9800
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Pentium Gold G6505T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium Gold G6505T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 3,698).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium Gold G6505T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A12-9800 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.
A12-9800
2017Pentium Gold G6505T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Pentium Gold G6505T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium Gold G6505T.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 3,698).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A12-9800 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium Gold G6505T better than A12-9800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A12-9800 and Pentium Gold G6505T

A12-9800
A12-9800
The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.

Pentium Gold G6505T
Pentium Gold G6505T
The Pentium Gold G6505T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,698 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold G6505T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 3.6 GHz on the Pentium Gold G6505T — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Gold G6505T uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Pentium Gold G6505T's 3,698 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium Gold G6505T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G6505T.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Comet Lake-R (2021) |
| PassMark | 3,695 | 3,698 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 635 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold G6505T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800) / not specified (Pentium Gold G6505T). The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Gold G6505T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Pentium Gold G6505T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













