
A12-9800
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A12-9800
2017Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 21,550).
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +175.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while A12-9800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
A12-9800
2017Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +175.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 21,550).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while A12-9800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than A12-9800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A12-9800 and Ryzen 5 5600

A12-9800
A12-9800
The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 141.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 635 vs 2,052, a 105.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 3,695 | 21,550+483% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 635 | 2,052+223% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












