
Xeon Gold 6244
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6244
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,609 vs 18,749).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6244
2019Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,609 vs 18,749).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4509Y better than Xeon Gold 6244?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6244 and Xeon Silver 4509Y

Xeon Gold 6244
Xeon Gold 6244
The Xeon Gold 6244 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,609 points. Launch price was $2,925.

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Xeon Silver 4509Y
The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6244 and Xeon Silver 4509Y share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6244 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6244 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6244 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6244 scores 18,609 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Silver 4509Y. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6244 vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB+10% | 22.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 18,609 | 18,749 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6244 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6244) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4509Y). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6244 rivals EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












