
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Xeon Silver 4509Y needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4509Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 18,793).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Xeon Silver 4509Y needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4509Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 18,793).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 4900HS better than Xeon Silver 4509Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 303 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 4900HS and Xeon Silver 4509Y


Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Xeon Silver 4509Y
The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 4900HS and Xeon Silver 4509Y share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+15% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 22.5 MB (total)+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 18,793 | 18,749 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-4266 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4509Y). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 4900HS | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile High-End | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












