Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Silver 4509Y

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4509Y

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Xeon Silver 4509Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4509Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 23 MB).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4509Y

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +181.3% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 18,793).
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 4900HS better than Xeon Silver 4509Y?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4509Y makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 4900HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 4900HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 4900HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 4900HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4509Y is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and 181.3% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 8 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
1080p
low173 FPS176 FPS
medium141 FPS142 FPS
high112 FPS116 FPS
ultra92 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS143 FPS
medium119 FPS113 FPS
high95 FPS90 FPS
ultra77 FPS71 FPS
4K
low81 FPS66 FPS
medium70 FPS55 FPS
high55 FPS44 FPS
ultra43 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
1080p
low353 FPS469 FPS
medium293 FPS428 FPS
high258 FPS355 FPS
ultra225 FPS321 FPS
1440p
low303 FPS431 FPS
medium260 FPS382 FPS
high233 FPS324 FPS
ultra198 FPS282 FPS
4K
low246 FPS280 FPS
medium218 FPS250 FPS
high197 FPS228 FPS
ultra171 FPS204 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
1080p
low470 FPS469 FPS
medium470 FPS469 FPS
high470 FPS469 FPS
ultra470 FPS469 FPS
1440p
low470 FPS469 FPS
medium470 FPS469 FPS
high468 FPS469 FPS
ultra415 FPS469 FPS
4K
low461 FPS469 FPS
medium391 FPS414 FPS
high343 FPS365 FPS
ultra281 FPS298 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
1080p
low470 FPS469 FPS
medium470 FPS469 FPS
high470 FPS469 FPS
ultra470 FPS469 FPS
1440p
low470 FPS469 FPS
medium470 FPS469 FPS
high470 FPS469 FPS
ultra429 FPS453 FPS
4K
low458 FPS469 FPS
medium415 FPS428 FPS
high363 FPS383 FPS
ultra310 FPS332 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 4900HS and Xeon Silver 4509Y

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4509Y

The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 4900HS and Xeon Silver 4509Y share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+5%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+15%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
22.5 MB (total)+181%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
18,793
18,749
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
Socket
FP6
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4509Y). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSXeon Silver 4509Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 8
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End