Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon Silver 4410T

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

10 Cores20 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
  • Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,487).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is at an unclear MSRP at $999 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4410T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low198 FPS181 FPS
medium172 FPS149 FPS
high141 FPS125 FPS
ultra110 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low155 FPS145 FPS
medium129 FPS114 FPS
high103 FPS93 FPS
ultra80 FPS72 FPS
4K
low69 FPS67 FPS
medium61 FPS56 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low407 FPS460 FPS
medium365 FPS394 FPS
high311 FPS323 FPS
ultra259 FPS272 FPS
1440p
low348 FPS389 FPS
medium318 FPS345 FPS
high272 FPS290 FPS
ultra224 FPS240 FPS
4K
low224 FPS250 FPS
medium204 FPS225 FPS
high185 FPS201 FPS
ultra150 FPS167 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low687 FPS681 FPS
medium687 FPS681 FPS
high687 FPS681 FPS
ultra687 FPS681 FPS
1440p
low687 FPS681 FPS
medium687 FPS681 FPS
high656 FPS681 FPS
ultra584 FPS610 FPS
4K
low519 FPS532 FPS
medium428 FPS434 FPS
high383 FPS376 FPS
ultra321 FPS307 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low687 FPS681 FPS
medium687 FPS681 FPS
high687 FPS681 FPS
ultra640 FPS592 FPS
1440p
low687 FPS681 FPS
medium687 FPS605 FPS
high611 FPS523 FPS
ultra510 FPS454 FPS
4K
low578 FPS479 FPS
medium517 FPS430 FPS
high458 FPS384 FPS
ultra382 FPS333 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon Silver 4410T

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X scores 27,487 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+60%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+26%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+22%
26.25 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,487
27,245
Geekbench 6 Single
1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
Socket
SP3r2
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1950XXeon Silver 4410T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation