
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,487).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,487).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 656 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 640 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 687 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 611 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon Silver 4410T


Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X scores 27,487 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+60% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+22% | 26.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,487 | 27,245 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











