
EPYC 4244P
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4244P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,245).
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4244P
2024Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,245).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4244P better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and Xeon Silver 4410T

EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P
The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4410T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 24.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+41% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+22% | 26.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,164 | 27,245 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,244 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,602 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,244 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | — |
| Target Use | Entry Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













