EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Silver 4410T

AMD

EPYC 4244P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

10 Cores20 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,245).

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
  • 130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 4244P is ahead with a 13.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4410T pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 4244P also has the bigger cache pool with 21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4410T is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4244P still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 4244P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low246 FPS181 FPS
medium228 FPS149 FPS
high197 FPS125 FPS
ultra171 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS145 FPS
medium182 FPS114 FPS
high151 FPS93 FPS
ultra133 FPS72 FPS
4K
low151 FPS67 FPS
medium127 FPS56 FPS
high99 FPS45 FPS
ultra85 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low525 FPS460 FPS
medium441 FPS394 FPS
high370 FPS323 FPS
ultra332 FPS272 FPS
1440p
low451 FPS389 FPS
medium392 FPS345 FPS
high333 FPS290 FPS
ultra288 FPS240 FPS
4K
low283 FPS250 FPS
medium251 FPS225 FPS
high234 FPS201 FPS
ultra203 FPS167 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low679 FPS681 FPS
medium679 FPS681 FPS
high679 FPS681 FPS
ultra679 FPS681 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS681 FPS
medium679 FPS681 FPS
high679 FPS681 FPS
ultra621 FPS610 FPS
4K
low539 FPS532 FPS
medium471 FPS434 FPS
high411 FPS376 FPS
ultra341 FPS307 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low679 FPS681 FPS
medium679 FPS681 FPS
high679 FPS681 FPS
ultra679 FPS592 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS681 FPS
medium679 FPS605 FPS
high679 FPS523 FPS
ultra645 FPS454 FPS
4K
low675 FPS479 FPS
medium594 FPS430 FPS
high526 FPS384 FPS
ultra437 FPS333 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and Xeon Silver 4410T

AMD

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4410T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 24.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+27%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+41%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+22%
26.25 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,164
27,245
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,244
Geekbench 6 Single
2,602
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
Socket
AM5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Silver 4410T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Entry Server