Core i9-13900HK vs Xeon Silver 4410T

Intel

Core i9-13900HK

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

10 Cores20 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,245).
  • Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900HK better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4410T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900HK is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4410T is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-13900HK is the smarter buy today. Core i9-13900HK is at an unclear MSRP at $697 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Silver 4410T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900HK is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low262 FPS181 FPS
medium253 FPS149 FPS
high210 FPS125 FPS
ultra180 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low223 FPS145 FPS
medium192 FPS114 FPS
high154 FPS93 FPS
ultra135 FPS72 FPS
4K
low154 FPS67 FPS
medium132 FPS56 FPS
high101 FPS45 FPS
ultra90 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low635 FPS460 FPS
medium543 FPS394 FPS
high458 FPS323 FPS
ultra417 FPS272 FPS
1440p
low553 FPS389 FPS
medium492 FPS345 FPS
high416 FPS290 FPS
ultra357 FPS240 FPS
4K
low325 FPS250 FPS
medium296 FPS225 FPS
high279 FPS201 FPS
ultra246 FPS167 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low648 FPS681 FPS
medium530 FPS681 FPS
high467 FPS681 FPS
ultra405 FPS681 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS681 FPS
medium491 FPS681 FPS
high427 FPS681 FPS
ultra370 FPS610 FPS
4K
low434 FPS532 FPS
medium374 FPS434 FPS
high339 FPS376 FPS
ultra290 FPS307 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low680 FPS681 FPS
medium680 FPS681 FPS
high680 FPS681 FPS
ultra672 FPS592 FPS
1440p
low680 FPS681 FPS
medium680 FPS605 FPS
high626 FPS523 FPS
ultra552 FPS454 FPS
4K
low555 FPS479 FPS
medium504 FPS430 FPS
high451 FPS384 FPS
ultra394 FPS333 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HK and Xeon Silver 4410T

Intel

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

FeatureCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+40%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+35%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
26.25 MB+9%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,217
27,245
Geekbench 6 Single
2,629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The Core i9-13900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-13900HKXeon Silver 4410T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d