
Core i9-13900HK
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900HK
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,245).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Core i9-13900HK
2023Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,245).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900HK better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 680 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HK and Xeon Silver 4410T

Core i9-13900HK
Core i9-13900HK
The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+35% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 26.25 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,217 | 27,245 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,629 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The Core i9-13900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













