Core i9-13900H vs Xeon Silver 4410T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,444).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,444).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900H better than Xeon Silver 4410T?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4410T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900H is the smarter buy today. Core i9-13900H is at an unclear MSRP at $617 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900H Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4410T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	262 FPS	181 FPS
medium	253 FPS	149 FPS
high	210 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	145 FPS
medium	192 FPS	114 FPS
high	154 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	67 FPS
medium	132 FPS	56 FPS
high	101 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	636 FPS	460 FPS
medium	543 FPS	394 FPS
high	458 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	389 FPS
medium	492 FPS	345 FPS
high	416 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	240 FPS
4K
low	325 FPS	250 FPS
medium	296 FPS	225 FPS
high	279 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	167 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	648 FPS	681 FPS
medium	530 FPS	681 FPS
high	467 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	681 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	681 FPS
medium	491 FPS	681 FPS
high	427 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	610 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	532 FPS
medium	374 FPS	434 FPS
high	339 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	307 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Xeon Silver 4410T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	686 FPS	681 FPS
medium	686 FPS	681 FPS
high	686 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	672 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	686 FPS	681 FPS
medium	686 FPS	605 FPS
high	626 FPS	523 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	454 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	479 FPS
medium	504 FPS	430 FPS
high	451 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	333 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Xeon Silver 4410T

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+40%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	26.25 MB+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,444	27,245

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.