
Core i9-12900H
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,079 vs 27,245).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-12900H
2022Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,079 vs 27,245).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900H better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 476 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900H and Xeon Silver 4410T

Core i9-12900H
Core i9-12900H
The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-12900H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900H scores 27,079 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 26.25 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,079 | 27,245 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-12900H) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The Core i9-12900H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i9-12900H | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













