
Xeon Gold 6248
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4314
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6248
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 150W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,095 vs 29,535).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6248
2019Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 150W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,095 vs 29,535).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6248 better than Xeon Silver 4314?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 738 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 730 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 738 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6248 and Xeon Silver 4314

Xeon Gold 6248
Xeon Gold 6248
The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Xeon Silver 4314
Xeon Silver 4314
The Xeon Silver 4314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 29,095 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6248 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4314 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6248 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6248 scores 29,535 against the Xeon Silver 4314's 29,095 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+15% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+1900% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 29,535+2% | 29,095 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,327 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,277 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6248 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4314 — the Xeon Silver 4314 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4314 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6248) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4314). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4314) — the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6248) and C621A (Xeon Silver 4314).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 2667+66575% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+17476167% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4314). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352; Xeon Silver 4314 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | General Purpose Enterprise Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












