
Xeon Gold 6148
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4314
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6148
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,021 vs 29,095).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($3,072 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $2,677 less on MSRP ($395 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 679.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 150W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6148
2017Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $2,677 less on MSRP ($395 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 679.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 150W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,021 vs 29,095).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($3,072 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4314 better than Xeon Gold 6148?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 726 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 726 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 726 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 726 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6148 and Xeon Silver 4314

Xeon Gold 6148
Xeon Gold 6148
The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Xeon Silver 4314
Xeon Silver 4314
The Xeon Silver 4314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 29,095 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6148 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4314 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6148 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6148 scores 29,021 against the Xeon Silver 4314's 29,095 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4314. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+15% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+1900% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 29,021 | 29,095 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,254 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,445 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6148 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4314 — the Xeon Silver 4314 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4314 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 768 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6148) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4314). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4314) — the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6148) and C621A (Xeon Silver 4314).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 2667+66575% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB+13107100% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4314). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon Silver 4314 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Enterprise Workloads | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6148 launched at $3072 MSRP, while the Xeon Silver 4314 debuted at $395. On MSRP ($3072 vs $395), the Xeon Silver 4314 is $2677 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6148 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 73.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4314 — making the Xeon Silver 4314 the 154.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6148 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3072 | $395-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 73.7+684% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












