Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon Gold 6136

12 Cores24 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

16 Cores32 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6136

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6136 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,049).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6136 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6136 better than Xeon Silver 4216?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6136 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6136 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6136 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6136 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Silver 4216 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 6136 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,011 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Silver 4216 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4216 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low179 FPS174 FPS
medium143 FPS139 FPS
high117 FPS111 FPS
ultra94 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS139 FPS
medium113 FPS109 FPS
high91 FPS86 FPS
ultra72 FPS68 FPS
4K
low67 FPS66 FPS
medium56 FPS55 FPS
high44 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low400 FPS188 FPS
medium346 FPS167 FPS
high291 FPS145 FPS
ultra244 FPS118 FPS
1440p
low346 FPS162 FPS
medium307 FPS148 FPS
high259 FPS128 FPS
ultra216 FPS104 FPS
4K
low225 FPS105 FPS
medium200 FPS97 FPS
high180 FPS85 FPS
ultra148 FPS68 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low526 FPS526 FPS
medium526 FPS526 FPS
high526 FPS526 FPS
ultra526 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low526 FPS526 FPS
medium526 FPS526 FPS
high526 FPS526 FPS
ultra512 FPS526 FPS
4K
low461 FPS473 FPS
medium361 FPS372 FPS
high321 FPS331 FPS
ultra261 FPS269 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low526 FPS526 FPS
medium526 FPS526 FPS
high526 FPS526 FPS
ultra526 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low526 FPS526 FPS
medium526 FPS526 FPS
high518 FPS508 FPS
ultra445 FPS430 FPS
4K
low472 FPS466 FPS
medium423 FPS417 FPS
high378 FPS372 FPS
ultra329 FPS321 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6136 and Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon Gold 6136

The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6136 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6136 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6136 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6136 scores 21,049 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6136. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+16%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
24.75 MB+13%
22 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
16 MB+33%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
21,049
21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,286
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon Silver 4216 — the Xeon Gold 6136 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4216 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6136) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4216).

FeatureXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2666+66550%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
768
1024 GB+139810033%
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6136) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.

FeatureXeon Gold 6136Xeon Silver 4216
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Edge computing