
Xeon Gold 6136
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4216
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6136
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Xeon Silver 4216
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6136 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,049).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6136 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6136
2017Xeon Silver 4216
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6136 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,049).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6136 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6136 better than Xeon Silver 4216?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 445 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6136 and Xeon Silver 4216

Xeon Gold 6136
Xeon Gold 6136
The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.

Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216
The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6136 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6136 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6136 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6136 scores 21,049 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6136. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB+13% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB+33% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,049 | 21,022 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,286 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon Silver 4216 — the Xeon Gold 6136 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4216 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6136) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4216).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | 1024 GB+139810033% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6136) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6136 | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server / Edge computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












