
Xeon E-2378G
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4216
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2378G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4216
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,153).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E-2378G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
Xeon E-2378G
2021Xeon Silver 4216
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,153).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E-2378G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2378G better than Xeon Silver 4216?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 453 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 529 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2378G and Xeon Silver 4216

Xeon E-2378G
Xeon E-2378G
The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216
The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2378G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2378G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378G scores 21,153 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2378G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378G vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+59% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+33% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,153 | 21,022 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,286 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2378G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2378G) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378G | Xeon Silver 4216 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server / Edge computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












