Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon E-2378G

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

16 Cores32 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E-2378G

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +52.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

  • +37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,153).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E-2378G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378G better than Xeon Silver 4216?
Yes. Xeon E-2378G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 52.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 52.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378G is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E-2378G is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Silver 4216 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E-2378G is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,011 MSRP, and it gives you a 52.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Silver 4216 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2378G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
1080p
low292 FPS174 FPS
medium260 FPS139 FPS
high219 FPS111 FPS
ultra188 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low240 FPS139 FPS
medium192 FPS109 FPS
high157 FPS86 FPS
ultra138 FPS68 FPS
4K
low166 FPS66 FPS
medium135 FPS55 FPS
high104 FPS43 FPS
ultra91 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
1080p
low529 FPS188 FPS
medium520 FPS167 FPS
high453 FPS145 FPS
ultra399 FPS118 FPS
1440p
low529 FPS162 FPS
medium484 FPS148 FPS
high417 FPS128 FPS
ultra353 FPS104 FPS
4K
low395 FPS105 FPS
medium335 FPS97 FPS
high316 FPS85 FPS
ultra268 FPS68 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
1080p
low529 FPS526 FPS
medium529 FPS526 FPS
high529 FPS526 FPS
ultra529 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low529 FPS526 FPS
medium529 FPS526 FPS
high514 FPS526 FPS
ultra441 FPS526 FPS
4K
low529 FPS473 FPS
medium454 FPS372 FPS
high404 FPS331 FPS
ultra339 FPS269 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
1080p
low529 FPS526 FPS
medium529 FPS526 FPS
high529 FPS526 FPS
ultra529 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low529 FPS526 FPS
medium529 FPS526 FPS
high529 FPS508 FPS
ultra529 FPS430 FPS
4K
low529 FPS466 FPS
medium529 FPS417 FPS
high503 FPS372 FPS
ultra436 FPS321 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2378G and Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon E-2378G

The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2378G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2378G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378G scores 21,153 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2378G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378G vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+59%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+33%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
22 MB+38%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
16 MB+3100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
21,153
21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,286
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2378G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
Socket
LGA1200
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2378G) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.

FeatureXeon E-2378GXeon Silver 4216
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Edge computing