PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon 6337P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $951 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,011 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1576.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,011 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 21,022).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.8 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($1,011 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6337P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6337P

2025

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $951 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,011 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1576.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,011 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 21,022).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.8 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($1,011 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6337P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6337P better than Xeon Silver 4216?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon 6337P is ahead with a 13.0% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4216 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon Silver 4216 also has the bigger cache pool with 22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4216 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6337P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6337P is $951 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $1,011 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Silver 4216 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 1576.6% better value on MSRP (348.6 vs 20.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6337P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon 6337P Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4216 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low	274 FPS	174 FPS
medium	257 FPS	139 FPS
high	216 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	239 FPS	139 FPS
medium	200 FPS	109 FPS
high	163 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	166 FPS	66 FPS
medium	139 FPS	55 FPS
high	108 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	34 FPS

Open Xeon 6337P Open Xeon Silver 4216

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low	523 FPS	188 FPS
medium	484 FPS	167 FPS
high	408 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	118 FPS
1440p
low	493 FPS	162 FPS
medium	430 FPS	148 FPS
high	366 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	315 FPS	105 FPS
medium	280 FPS	97 FPS
high	261 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	68 FPS

Open Xeon 6337P Open Xeon Silver 4216

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low	523 FPS	526 FPS
medium	523 FPS	526 FPS
high	523 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	523 FPS	526 FPS
1440p
low	523 FPS	526 FPS
medium	523 FPS	526 FPS
high	523 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	478 FPS	526 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	473 FPS
medium	454 FPS	372 FPS
high	393 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	269 FPS

Open Xeon 6337P Open Xeon Silver 4216

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low	523 FPS	526 FPS
medium	523 FPS	526 FPS
high	523 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	523 FPS	526 FPS
1440p
low	523 FPS	526 FPS
medium	523 FPS	526 FPS
high	523 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	516 FPS	430 FPS
4K
low	523 FPS	466 FPS
medium	495 FPS	417 FPS
high	434 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	321 FPS

Open Xeon 6337P Open Xeon Silver 4216

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6337P and Xeon Silver 4216

Xeon 6337P

The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6337P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6337P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6337P scores 20,917 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Silver 4216. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6337P vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

Feature	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+56%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	22 MB+22%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	16 MB+1180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	20,917	21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,286

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6337P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 6337P) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.

Feature	Xeon 6337P	Xeon Silver 4216
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Server / Edge computing

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6337P launched at $60 MSRP, while the Xeon Silver 4216 debuted at $1011. On MSRP ($60 vs $1011), the Xeon 6337P is $951 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6337P delivers 348.6 pts/$ vs 20.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4216 — making the Xeon 6337P the 177.5% better value option.