Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4116

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 14,918).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2680 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 14,918).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2680 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Xeon E5-2680 v3?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is ahead with a 14.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2680 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4116 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2680 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Silver 4116 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,745 MSRP, and it gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2680 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2680 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4116 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4116 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low	162 FPS	167 FPS
medium	142 FPS	133 FPS
high	115 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	136 FPS	139 FPS
medium	116 FPS	109 FPS
high	91 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	65 FPS
medium	57 FPS	55 FPS
high	44 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	34 FPS

Open Xeon E5-2680 v3 Open Xeon Silver 4116

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low	330 FPS	141 FPS
medium	299 FPS	124 FPS
high	258 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	212 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	285 FPS	124 FPS
medium	261 FPS	112 FPS
high	227 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	185 FPS	90 FPS
medium	169 FPS	84 FPS
high	146 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	58 FPS

Open Xeon E5-2680 v3 Open Xeon Silver 4116

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	372 FPS	373 FPS
high	372 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	372 FPS	373 FPS
high	372 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	373 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	357 FPS	367 FPS
high	323 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	266 FPS

Open Xeon E5-2680 v3 Open Xeon Silver 4116

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	372 FPS	373 FPS
high	372 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	372 FPS	373 FPS
high	372 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	373 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	373 FPS
medium	372 FPS	373 FPS
high	372 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	332 FPS	334 FPS

Open Xeon E5-2680 v3 Open Xeon Silver 4116

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Xeon Silver 4116

Xeon E5-2680 v3

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Xeon Silver 4116 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v3 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v3 scores 14,864 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+82%	16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,864	14,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.