Xeon E5-2658A V3 vs Xeon Silver 4116

Intel

Xeon E5-2658A V3

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4116

12 Cores24 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2658A V3

2015

Why buy it

  • +81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (14,879 vs 14,918).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,832 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Xeon E5-2658A V3?
Yes. Xeon Silver 4116 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4116 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2658A V3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Silver 4116 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,832 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2658A V3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4116 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low160 FPS167 FPS
medium138 FPS133 FPS
high112 FPS108 FPS
ultra92 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS139 FPS
medium113 FPS109 FPS
high89 FPS87 FPS
ultra72 FPS68 FPS
4K
low62 FPS65 FPS
medium56 FPS55 FPS
high44 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low193 FPS141 FPS
medium175 FPS124 FPS
high151 FPS113 FPS
ultra125 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low167 FPS124 FPS
medium153 FPS112 FPS
high134 FPS101 FPS
ultra109 FPS80 FPS
4K
low109 FPS90 FPS
medium101 FPS84 FPS
high89 FPS74 FPS
ultra71 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium372 FPS373 FPS
high372 FPS373 FPS
ultra366 FPS373 FPS
1440p
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium372 FPS373 FPS
high372 FPS373 FPS
ultra330 FPS373 FPS
4K
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium316 FPS367 FPS
high281 FPS325 FPS
ultra232 FPS266 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium372 FPS373 FPS
high372 FPS373 FPS
ultra372 FPS373 FPS
1440p
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium372 FPS373 FPS
high372 FPS373 FPS
ultra372 FPS373 FPS
4K
low372 FPS373 FPS
medium372 FPS373 FPS
high372 FPS373 FPS
ultra324 FPS334 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2658A V3 and Xeon Silver 4116

Intel

Xeon E5-2658A V3

The Xeon E5-2658A V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,879 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2658A V3 and Xeon Silver 4116 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4116 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2658A V3 scores 14,879 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

FeatureXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
12 / 24
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+5%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+82%
16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
14,879
14,918
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
Socket
LGA2011-3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2658A V3) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2658A V3 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-2658A V3Xeon Silver 4116
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server