
Xeon E5-2658A V3
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2658A V3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,879 vs 14,918).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,832 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-2658A V3
2015Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,879 vs 14,918).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,832 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Xeon E5-2658A V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2658A V3 and Xeon Silver 4116

Xeon E5-2658A V3
Xeon E5-2658A V3
The Xeon E5-2658A V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,879 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-2658A V3 and Xeon Silver 4116 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4116 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2658A V3 scores 14,879 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+82% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,879 | 14,918 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2658A V3) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2658A V3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2658A V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













