
Xeon E5-1681 V3
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-1681 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,820 vs 14,918).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,589 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).
Xeon E5-1681 V3
2014Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅+51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,820 vs 14,918).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,589 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Xeon E5-1681 V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1681 V3 and Xeon Silver 4116

Xeon E5-1681 V3
Xeon E5-1681 V3
The Xeon E5-1681 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,820 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-1681 V3 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-1681 V3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1681 V3 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1681 V3 scores 14,820 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1681 V3 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+38% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+52% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,820 | 14,918 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,050 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E5-1681 V3) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116).
| Feature | Xeon E5-1681 V3 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













