
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2660 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,393 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).
Xeon E5-2660 v2
2013Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,393 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2660 v2 better than Xeon Silver 4110?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon Silver 4110

Xeon E5-2660 v2
Xeon E5-2660 v2
The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.

Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2660 v2 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2660 v2 scores 10,353 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v2. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+127% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 10,353 | 10,314 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 versus 2400 on the Xeon Silver 4110 — the Xeon Silver 4110 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4110 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 768 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2660 v2) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4110). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2660 v2) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4110) — the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2660 v2) and C621 (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | 2400+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB+78643100% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











