
Xeon E5-2643 v3
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2643 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,265 vs 10,314).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).
Xeon E5-2643 v3
2014Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 135W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,265 vs 10,314).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4110 better than Xeon E5-2643 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2643 v3 and Xeon Silver 4110

Xeon E5-2643 v3
Xeon E5-2643 v3
The Xeon E5-2643 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,265 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2643 v3 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2643 v3 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2643 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2643 v3 scores 10,265 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Silver 4110. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643 v3 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+62% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+82% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 10,265 | 10,314 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2643 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2643 v3) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2643 v3 | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













