Xeon E-2324G vs Xeon Silver 4110

Intel

Xeon E-2324G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4110

8 Cores16 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E-2324G

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

  • +37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2324G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,339).
  • 30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2324G better than Xeon Silver 4110?
Yes. Xeon E-2324G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2324G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.9% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2324G is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E-2324G still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon E-2324G is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 25.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2324G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
1080p
low162 FPS169 FPS
medium142 FPS134 FPS
high112 FPS108 FPS
ultra92 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS138 FPS
medium119 FPS107 FPS
high94 FPS85 FPS
ultra79 FPS68 FPS
4K
low78 FPS65 FPS
medium72 FPS54 FPS
high56 FPS43 FPS
ultra44 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
1080p
low246 FPS124 FPS
medium207 FPS110 FPS
high191 FPS103 FPS
ultra170 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low213 FPS110 FPS
medium179 FPS100 FPS
high166 FPS93 FPS
ultra146 FPS75 FPS
4K
low159 FPS91 FPS
medium135 FPS84 FPS
high114 FPS75 FPS
ultra92 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
1080p
low258 FPS258 FPS
medium258 FPS258 FPS
high258 FPS258 FPS
ultra257 FPS258 FPS
1440p
low258 FPS258 FPS
medium258 FPS258 FPS
high258 FPS258 FPS
ultra222 FPS258 FPS
4K
low234 FPS258 FPS
medium199 FPS258 FPS
high173 FPS258 FPS
ultra139 FPS258 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
1080p
low258 FPS258 FPS
medium258 FPS258 FPS
high258 FPS258 FPS
ultra258 FPS258 FPS
1440p
low258 FPS258 FPS
medium258 FPS258 FPS
high258 FPS258 FPS
ultra258 FPS258 FPS
4K
low258 FPS258 FPS
medium258 FPS258 FPS
high258 FPS258 FPS
ultra258 FPS258 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2324G and Xeon Silver 4110

Intel

Xeon E-2324G

The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2324G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2324G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2324G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2324G scores 10,339 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E-2324G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2324G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.

FeatureXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+53%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+48%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
11 MB+38%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
8 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
10,339
10,314
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2324G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
Socket
LGA1200
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2324G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110).

FeatureXeon E-2324GXeon Silver 4110
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d