
Xeon E-2324G
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2324G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2324G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,339).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Xeon E-2324G
2021Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2324G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,339).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2324G better than Xeon Silver 4110?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2324G and Xeon Silver 4110

Xeon E-2324G
Xeon E-2324G
The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.

Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2324G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2324G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2324G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2324G scores 10,339 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E-2324G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2324G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.
| Feature | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+53% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+48% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 11 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 10,339 | 10,314 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2324G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2324G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Xeon E-2324G | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











