
Core i7-8700T
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-8700T
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,213 vs 10,314).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700T across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Core i7-8700T
2018Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,213 vs 10,314).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700T across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8700T better than Xeon Silver 4110?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8700T and Xeon Silver 4110

Core i7-8700T
Core i7-8700T
The Core i7-8700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,213 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Core i7-8700T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-8700T versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-8700T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8700T scores 10,213 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4110. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-8700T vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.
| Feature | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+33% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+14% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+9% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 10,213 | 10,314 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-8700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-8700T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Core i7-8700T | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













