
Core i7-5930K
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-5930K
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 11 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 40.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 140W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-5930K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,369).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 15 MB).
Core i7-5930K
2014Xeon Silver 4110
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 11 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 40.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 140W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-5930K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,369).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 15 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-5930K better than Xeon Silver 4110?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-5930K and Xeon Silver 4110

Core i7-5930K
Core i7-5930K
The Core i7-5930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,369 points. Launch price was $613.

Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-5930K versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5930K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-5930K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5930K scores 10,369 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-5930K. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5930K vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.
| Feature | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+36% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-E (2014) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 10,369 | 10,314 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-5930K versus 2400 on the Xeon Silver 4110 — the Xeon Silver 4110 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4110 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i7-5930K) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4110). PCIe lanes: 40 (Core i7-5930K) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4110) — the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X99 (Core i7-5930K) and C621 (Xeon Silver 4110).
| Feature | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | 2400+59900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+6553500% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-5930K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Silver 4110 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i7-5930K targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-5930K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-5930K | Xeon Silver 4110 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High End Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











