PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-9600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +49.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Silver 4110 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4110.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,313 vs 10,314).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $224 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-9600.

Core i5-9600

2019

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +49.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Silver 4110 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4110.

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,313 vs 10,314).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $224 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-9600.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-9600 better than Xeon Silver 4110?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-9600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4110 is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-9600 is the smarter buy today. Core i5-9600 is at an unclear MSRP at $224 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 49.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Silver 4110 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-9600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-9600 Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4110 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
1080p
low	180 FPS	169 FPS
medium	148 FPS	134 FPS
high	120 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	155 FPS	138 FPS
medium	124 FPS	107 FPS
high	100 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	65 FPS
medium	75 FPS	54 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-9600 Open Xeon Silver 4110

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
1080p
low	258 FPS	124 FPS
medium	258 FPS	110 FPS
high	258 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	110 FPS
medium	258 FPS	100 FPS
high	255 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	91 FPS
medium	233 FPS	84 FPS
high	213 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	58 FPS

Open Core i5-9600 Open Xeon Silver 4110

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
1080p
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	258 FPS	258 FPS
high	258 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	258 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	258 FPS	258 FPS
high	258 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	239 FPS	258 FPS
high	202 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	258 FPS

Open Core i5-9600 Open Xeon Silver 4110

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
1080p
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	258 FPS	258 FPS
high	258 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	258 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	258 FPS	258 FPS
high	258 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	258 FPS
medium	258 FPS	258 FPS
high	258 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	258 FPS

Open Core i5-9600 Open Xeon Silver 4110

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9600 and Xeon Silver 4110

Core i5-9600

The Core i5-9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,313 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-9600 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-9600 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9600 scores 10,313 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Silver 4110. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.

Feature	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+53%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+48%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	9 MB (total)	11 MB+22%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,313	10,314
Geekbench 6 Single	1,443	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9600 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9600 versus 2400 on the Xeon Silver 4110 — the Xeon Silver 4110 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4110 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-9600) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4110). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-9600) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4110) — the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B360,H370,H310,Q370,Z390,B365 (Core i5-9600) and C621 (Xeon Silver 4110).

Feature	Core i5-9600	Xeon Silver 4110
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2400+59900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+13107100%	1024
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Silver 4110 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110). The Core i5-9600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Silver 4110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.