EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7713

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8592+

64 Cores128 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7713

64 / 128

83,018

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8592+

64 / 128

84,013

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,540 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8592+ across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.

EPYC 7713

2021

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,540 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8592+ across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8592+ better than EPYC 7713?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.6% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8592+ is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7713 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8592+ is 64.3% more expensive on MSRP at $11,600 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7713 is also 62.4% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7713 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8592+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	195 FPS	188 FPS
medium	159 FPS	165 FPS
high	129 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	155 FPS
medium	125 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	70 FPS
medium	60 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	267 FPS	277 FPS
medium	235 FPS	246 FPS
high	193 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	167 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	230 FPS
medium	198 FPS	208 FPS
high	167 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	135 FPS	143 FPS
medium	124 FPS	131 FPS
high	112 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	99 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	837 FPS	849 FPS
medium	698 FPS	768 FPS
high	650 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	574 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	737 FPS
medium	500 FPS	662 FPS
high	459 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	401 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	493 FPS
medium	336 FPS	402 FPS
high	300 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	975 FPS	938 FPS
medium	883 FPS	849 FPS
high	758 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	752 FPS	776 FPS
medium	654 FPS	677 FPS
high	558 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	559 FPS
medium	479 FPS	501 FPS
high	420 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	383 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7713 and Xeon Platinum 8592+

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7713 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713 vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	3.9 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2 GHz+5%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	83,018	84,013+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the EPYC 7713 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7713 launched at $7060 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($7060 vs $11600), the EPYC 7713 is $4540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the EPYC 7713 the 47.5% better value option.