
EPYC 7773X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+631.4% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 105 MB).
- ✅Costs $559 less on MSRP ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8470 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8470 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8470
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 91,340).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
EPYC 7773X
2022Xeon Platinum 8470
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+631.4% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 105 MB).
- ✅Costs $559 less on MSRP ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8470 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8470 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 91,340).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7773X better than Xeon Platinum 8470?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 854 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 955 FPS | 982 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 885 FPS |
| high | 742 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 662 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 803 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and Xeon Platinum 8470

EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

Xeon Platinum 8470
Xeon Platinum 8470
The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8470 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7773X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+23% | 52 / 104 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+631% | 105 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 91,340+2% | 89,850 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — the Xeon Platinum 8470 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the EPYC 7773X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Server | Cloud Infrastructure |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 debuted at $9359. On MSRP ($8800 vs $9359), the EPYC 7773X is $559 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the EPYC 7773X the 7.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800-6% | $9359 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4+8% | 9.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













