PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,195 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1377.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 46,825).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,195 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1377.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 46,825).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900F better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14900F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900F is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900F is the smarter buy today. Core i9-14900F is $7,195 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1377.6% better value on MSRP (89.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-14900F Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	318 FPS	190 FPS
medium	309 FPS	154 FPS
high	244 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	276 FPS	157 FPS
medium	238 FPS	123 FPS
high	176 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	72 FPS
medium	162 FPS	60 FPS
high	121 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	497 FPS	496 FPS
medium	436 FPS	431 FPS
high	355 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	422 FPS	425 FPS
medium	381 FPS	375 FPS
high	317 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	236 FPS	264 FPS
medium	217 FPS	237 FPS
high	206 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	174 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	760 FPS	960 FPS
medium	624 FPS	836 FPS
high	541 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	465 FPS	701 FPS
1440p
low	680 FPS	759 FPS
medium	567 FPS	652 FPS
high	485 FPS	616 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	500 FPS	487 FPS
medium	439 FPS	383 FPS
high	391 FPS	340 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	278 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	990 FPS	930 FPS
medium	886 FPS	844 FPS
high	774 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	688 FPS	631 FPS
1440p
low	821 FPS	728 FPS
medium	723 FPS	641 FPS
high	631 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	473 FPS
4K
low	606 FPS	525 FPS
medium	543 FPS	470 FPS
high	480 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	358 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 40.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-14900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+51%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+58%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	46,825	46,681
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,820	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($524 vs $7719), the Core i9-14900F is $7195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Core i9-14900F the 174.6% better value option.