PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8268 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8268, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,133).
❌Launch MSRP is still $6,302 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2024

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8268 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8268, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,133).
❌Launch MSRP is still $6,302 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than Xeon Platinum 8268?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8268 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8268 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $6,302 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8268 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8268 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	246 FPS	194 FPS
medium	231 FPS	157 FPS
high	194 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	216 FPS	159 FPS
medium	184 FPS	124 FPS
high	148 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	150 FPS	72 FPS
medium	128 FPS	60 FPS
high	98 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	351 FPS	424 FPS
medium	298 FPS	370 FPS
high	254 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	230 FPS	249 FPS
1440p
low	305 FPS	366 FPS
medium	268 FPS	322 FPS
high	229 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	212 FPS
4K
low	180 FPS	228 FPS
medium	162 FPS	203 FPS
high	155 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	148 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	758 FPS	877 FPS
medium	602 FPS	877 FPS
high	525 FPS	872 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	787 FPS
1440p
low	677 FPS	731 FPS
medium	545 FPS	632 FPS
high	469 FPS	600 FPS
ultra	400 FPS	537 FPS
4K
low	491 FPS	468 FPS
medium	410 FPS	368 FPS
high	369 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	269 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Open Xeon Platinum 8268

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	878 FPS	877 FPS
medium	811 FPS	848 FPS
high	695 FPS	733 FPS
ultra	627 FPS	637 FPS
1440p
low	759 FPS	736 FPS
medium	680 FPS	646 FPS
high	583 FPS	555 FPS
ultra	515 FPS	476 FPS
4K
low	519 FPS	531 FPS
medium	473 FPS	473 FPS
high	420 FPS	416 FPS
ultra	369 FPS	361 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Xeon Platinum 8268

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8268

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 35,133 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+31%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	35.75 MB (total)+49%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Strix Point (2024−2025)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	35,133	35,081
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	24,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,046

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	7500+187400%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256	1024 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Xeon Platinum 8268
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon 890M	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	High-end Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($0 vs $6302), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is $6302 cheaper.