
Xeon Gold 6246R
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 18,500).
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Xeon Platinum 8260
2019Why buy it
- ✅+15.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Xeon Platinum 8260
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+15.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 18,500).
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8260 better than Xeon Gold 6246R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 762 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 762 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 762 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 596 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 411 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 232 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 762 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 762 FPS | 753 FPS |
| ultra | 739 FPS | 655 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 752 FPS |
| medium | 762 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 566 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 366 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon Platinum 8260

Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.

Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260
The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6246R packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — a 5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6246R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6246R scores 30,468 against the Xeon Platinum 8260's 30,720 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,000 vs 18,500 (14.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,293 vs 1,190, a 8.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,848 vs 6,946 (34.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+5% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB | 35.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 30,468 | 30,720 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,000 | 18,500+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,293+9% | 1,190 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,848+42% | 6,946 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial, Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Xeon Platinum 8260 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server / Financial | Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













