Xeon Gold 6246R vs Xeon Platinum 8260

Intel

Xeon Gold 6246R

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6246R

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 18,500).
  • 24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.

Xeon Platinum 8260

2019

Why buy it

  • +15.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8260 better than Xeon Gold 6246R?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6246R is ahead with a 25.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 pulls ahead with 15.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 is the better fit. You are getting 15.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8260 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8260 is at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 15.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6246R is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 25.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6246R is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
1080p
low198 FPS194 FPS
medium156 FPS158 FPS
high126 FPS127 FPS
ultra98 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low162 FPS158 FPS
medium124 FPS123 FPS
high96 FPS96 FPS
ultra76 FPS76 FPS
4K
low74 FPS72 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high47 FPS46 FPS
ultra38 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
1080p
low505 FPS423 FPS
medium442 FPS368 FPS
high366 FPS300 FPS
ultra326 FPS247 FPS
1440p
low446 FPS365 FPS
medium391 FPS321 FPS
high328 FPS264 FPS
ultra275 FPS210 FPS
4K
low282 FPS228 FPS
medium248 FPS202 FPS
high226 FPS178 FPS
ultra201 FPS146 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
1080p
low762 FPS768 FPS
medium762 FPS649 FPS
high762 FPS600 FPS
ultra762 FPS530 FPS
1440p
low762 FPS573 FPS
medium720 FPS467 FPS
high665 FPS425 FPS
ultra596 FPS372 FPS
4K
low516 FPS411 FPS
medium423 FPS321 FPS
high372 FPS286 FPS
ultra306 FPS232 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
1080p
low762 FPS768 FPS
medium762 FPS768 FPS
high762 FPS753 FPS
ultra739 FPS655 FPS
1440p
low762 FPS752 FPS
medium762 FPS659 FPS
high673 FPS566 FPS
ultra568 FPS486 FPS
4K
low677 FPS542 FPS
medium592 FPS483 FPS
high511 FPS424 FPS
ultra428 FPS366 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon Platinum 8260

Intel

Xeon Gold 6246R

The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6246R packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — a 5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6246R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6246R scores 30,468 against the Xeon Platinum 8260's 30,720 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,000 vs 18,500 (14.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,293 vs 1,190, a 8.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,848 vs 6,946 (34.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260.

FeatureXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+5%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+42%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
35.75 MB
35.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+1500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
30,468
30,720
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,000
18,500+16%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,293+9%
1,190
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,848+42%
6,946
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260).

FeatureXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial, Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

FeatureXeon Gold 6246RXeon Platinum 8260
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-frequency Server / Financial
Server / Workstation